Direct naar de inhoud

Let op! Dit is de beta website van BHIC. Hier testen we onze nieuwe website. Reacties die je hier achterlaat, gaan verloren.

Terug naar overzicht

BHIC database errors; aktedatum > 2000

4 reacties

fbax.​ca

The BHIC search page does not allow period year > 2000.
However; WieWasWie allows searching any year.
If we search for all records between 2000 and 9999; we see that 9999 is used by many archives when year is not known.
* Change the search to period 2000 to 9998
* Select Organization = BHIC
* Click "Datum" column heading to put highest years at top of list.

Now we see there are many thousand of entries with datum "1-1-1500"; ignore those. Then the first eight "aktes" appear to be database errors.

4 reacties

  • Helena29 okt 2019, 04:50

    You are probably referring to searching in Wiewaswie where you can shuffle the date >2000 to any year up to 9999.

    Unlike what the rules are in other countries...in The Netherlands - and If the privacy rules are followed...- one would not be able to find any entry in the official burgerlijke stand registers beyond the following parameters and perhaps that is a reason that BHIC does not (yet) go beyond 2000?
    geboorteakten - 100 jaar na geboorte
    huwelijksakten - 75 jaar na huwelijk
    overlijdensakten - 50 jaar na overlijden

    In Wiewaswie:
    Often the date in the index reflects the starting year of a register and not the actual year you are searching for or would like to see. Some examples:
    - Memories van Successie - for some places they all appear in the index as 01-01-1500
    - Memorial cards / Bidprentjes collections that cover the period 1763-2014 ...most of these will be in the index with that starting date -> 01-01-1763.
    - and more irregularities...such as registratie datum ' 26-5116 ' or ' 08-3319 '

    And those eight entries you are referring, starting with ' 19-01-7713' followed by a couple of ' 11-3106 ' and a few '2207' , are just little mistakes. Just click on the entry and look into the scan of the original. You will find the correct date in the orginal document (sometimes in Wiewaswie it reflects the registration date and not the date itself). == The index is only a guide ==

  • fbax.​caVraagsteller29 okt 2019, 09:43

    Helena: These 8 entries are not "just little mistakes". Anyone that uses BHIC rather than WieWasWie will not see this data in search results because BHIC searches using aktedatum and results > 2000 are not visible. Hopefully an archivist will fix this data issue.

  • HenkD29 okt 2019, 11:09

    Frank, regarding these 8 entries: it really are just little mistakes.
    It concerns 3 akten with a wrong registratiedatum. But you will nevertheless find them in the BHIC database because the registration date is not used. Only the eventdate.
    (In the third akte the eventdate is also wrong, so you will not find that akte if you use the period-slide). That's it.

    You can do the same exercise in WWW with the following search:
    periode: 0000 - 1499
    Archiefinstelling : BHIC

    Then you'll find 75 entries (a total of 11 akten) with incorrect event- and registration dates.
    These are just typo's and you can report them to BHIC when you encouter one.
    They'll be happy to fix it ;-)

  • Mariët Bruggeman2 nov 2019, 13:05

    Off course we are happy to fix it; As I understand my collegeau has already adjusted the entries of the first period. But the last one (0-1499) is a bit more tricky. Because this is not our 'fault' but an inconvenience of WWW. But it has their intention and WWW is surely working on it.

Je ziet 4 van 4 reacties

Neem contact op met

Log in om contact op te nemen. Alleen ingelogde gebruikers met een bevestigd e-mailadres kunnen een bericht sturen.

Feedback geven

Wat vind je van deze pagina? We horen graag wat beter kan.

0 van 300 tekens gebruikt

Deel geen gevoelige gegevens, zoals je BSN, adres, telefoonnummer of medische informatie.