Let op! Dit is de beta website van BHIC. Hier testen we onze nieuwe website. Reacties die je hier achterlaat, gaan verloren.
30-01-1734 Eindhoven Antonet Bogers en Jan van der Linden; beide geb te Strijp.
It is not clear to me if this "akte" is "trouw" or "ondertrouw"?
I looked at the scans at RHCe. Up to page 50 (scan 52) very many of the marriages have "trouw" date in the left margin. After page 51v (scan 54), "trouw" is not recorded and rarely is there any note in the margin.
I think I should record this event as 30-jan-1734 ondertrouw, correct?
If it was on a saterday you can assume it is "ondertrouw". If it was on a sunday, most-likely it is "trouw".
30 January 1734 was a Friday according to Grotefend.
It's clear, the insciption 30-01-1734 said "ondertrouw".
Regards.
Norah; I was looking at this scan. I do not see "ondertrouw". Where is this written?
rhc-eindhoven.nl/collectie?mivast=48&mizig=380&miadt=48&miaet=54&micode=DTB_Eindhoven_10225_14.8&minr=12504310&miview=ldt (opent in een nieuw tabblad)
On the next page there is written in the margin: "All persons above (meaning in the years 1732-1734) have married in due time, for which attestation is given." The same message can be found at the end of the year 1731 on folio 51v/scan 54, for both 1730 and 1731.
Je ziet 5 van 5 reacties